07-30-2021, 11:12 AM
[quote pid='27616' dateline='1627660708']
[quote pid='27612' dateline='1627658028']
It doesn't look like MRK was in 60s range in 90s : there were a few splits
[/quote]
Um, I don't think so. Yahoo Finance accounts for splits in its charts, and I do recall starting to buy early 1998 when it was in the 50s, then into the 60s in 1999. It would be good to know if yahoo finance is wrong.
[/quote]
I think it's been Pfizer's twin as it ran to the moon in the late 90s. Not like it was a terrible company, just fools paying triple or more the normal and wondering why they were victimized. I did the same with PFE and a few other stocks. You repeatedly pay a 60 PE for a mature company you get what you asked for eventually. Hard lessons.
[quote pid='27612' dateline='1627658028']
(07-29-2021, 08:35 AM)ken-do-nim Wrote: I used to buy Merck back in the late 90s on a monthly basis. I recall the stock price was in the 60s. Oh look, 20+ years later, it's finally in the 70s
It doesn't look like MRK was in 60s range in 90s : there were a few splits
[/quote]
Um, I don't think so. Yahoo Finance accounts for splits in its charts, and I do recall starting to buy early 1998 when it was in the 50s, then into the 60s in 1999. It would be good to know if yahoo finance is wrong.
[/quote]
I think it's been Pfizer's twin as it ran to the moon in the late 90s. Not like it was a terrible company, just fools paying triple or more the normal and wondering why they were victimized. I did the same with PFE and a few other stocks. You repeatedly pay a 60 PE for a mature company you get what you asked for eventually. Hard lessons.