Posts: 270
Threads: 50
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
6
I've been meaning to do the free trial of FAST graphs. You guys really think it valuable? Whenever I see them used on SA I think to myself that maybe they can be a bit too misleading. But maybe I don't really understand how it works. In the samples, it seems compelling to conclude that a stock is undervalued when the black line is below the orange line, and overvalued when it is above. But isn't the orange line just drawn at an arbitrary 15 times earnings? That is, doesn't it just use a P/E of 15 to evaluate whether all stocks are over or under valued?
Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation:
2
Isn't the basic subscription ($10) a month to basic? In the way that it actually doesn't provide any helpful information? The more expensive subscription has price/sales, cashflow and free cash flow overlay, forecasting.
I long ago gave up all financial subscriptions. With whats available on the internet and the library, you already have access to most of the information needed.
Niles site is a good example and even $10/mo invested in a good DG stock will give you a nice return in 10 yrs
Posts: 270
Threads: 50
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
6
Another question about FAST Graphs: Does it give you easy access to the underlying data? For example, if I just wanted to look at quarterly EPS data for the last 10 years, is that available?