Posts: 1,899
Threads: 48
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
10
I've owned V for a few years and have loved it. I've never owned MA or DFS but have been watching them. I just noticed that DFS is trading at 11 times earnings while V and MA are both over 30x. Is that correct? Why is DFS only at 11x?
Posts: 2,411
Threads: 54
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
34
My info shows the same of around an 11 PE.
A few things that stand out to me are the lower credit rating (BBB- vs. A+ and A), lower growth rate (7.3% vs. 16% and 17%) over the last 5 years, under-performance during the recession where earnings crashed compared with continued growth from MA and V, and lower growth forecasts of 8.25% vs. 16-17%.
I suppose a combo of all of that makes it less attractive to the market so it trades at a lower multiple.
Posts: 1,873
Threads: 35
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
6
You all left out AXP. To me that's the best buy in the group. Trading at only 15x next years earnings. DFS has always traded at a lower multiple. Good company but that doesn't get the respect it deserves on Wall Street.
Posts: 1,394
Threads: 33
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
19
I take a peek at V once in a while. I love the idea behind it and it's one of the few that are basically accepted in most corners of the world. I know I've used mine on 4 different continents. MA would certainly fit the bill too. But their P/E is just too high for me. Couple that with the minimal dividend.. actually I haven't looked into the reasons.
They both have a tiny tiny payout ratio, where are the profits going to?
Haven't looked at AXP, though it might be an option with a much more manageable P/E, or then I will just have to wait until a larger dip comes along before I go with V.
Posts: 1,873
Threads: 35
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
6
I actually added to my V this morning. All this talk made me buy more lol. Usually that's a good sign when a lot of talk is going on these boards lol. V will be $200 in 3+ years. So I figured why wait when this is a long term play anyway!