08-02-2021, 07:49 AM 
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
		Thread Rating:
		
	| 
					The dividend shuffle game?
				 | 
| 
		Same thing, long-term bonds.  Remember that thread where we were talking about monthly automated strategies?  TMF or TYD can be used a strategy.  Hide out in TMF when TQQQ has poor momentum the past 3 months.  TMF might not go up a lot if TQQQ crashes, but it will likely be flat at the worst.  When rates were higher long-term bonds worked extremely well as a stock market hedge.  The 60/40 strategy I'm sure you've heard about back tests well the past 100+ years. About 70% of Vanguards bond funds have a negative total return this year and yield less than 2%. Not a great place for a retiree to fight inflation and get some income to spend. 
		This is worth doing Ken.  Pull up a one month chart of TQQQ and add TMF as a comparison stock.  See how it might be tempting for a trader to attempt to flip back and forth?  In a paired trade last month they are both positive, but it takes the daily volatility out when TQQQ has a particularly big move.  Works about the same with QQQ/TLT.  You can't see the point in a long-term chart.  Now look at ten years.  The bond fund is chugging along paying you a 2 or 5% yield over the long-term unless rates make a big move.  QQQ is blowing TLT away as a long-term hold in a strong bull market obviously.  Graphically you can't see how it would be beneficial in a pair over a longer term, but it is if you are using rules and trading in and out of QQQ, or at least adjusting the ratio of QQQ vs the long-term bond fund.
	 
		
		
		08-02-2021, 08:48 AM 
(This post was last modified: 08-02-2021, 08:49 AM by ken-do-nim.)
		
	 
		I'm honestly not sure what my portfolio will look like when I'm in the capital preservation, drawdown phase, but I guess I have many years to figure that out.  It also makes a difference what the port size is.  If I get to the $2M mark, I'm going to want a higher port yield than if I make it to $4M, and the lower the port yield, the closer I can get to just putting it all in VOO or SCHD. (cross-post: this was in reference to including bonds in the port) 
		
		
		08-02-2021, 09:43 AM 
		
	 (08-02-2021, 08:48 AM)ken-do-nim Wrote: I'm honestly not sure what my portfolio will look like when I'm in the capital preservation, drawdown phase, but I guess I have many years to figure that out. It also makes a difference what the port size is. If I get to the $2M mark, I'm going to want a higher port yield than if I make it to $4M, and the lower the port yield, the closer I can get to just putting it all in VOO or SCHD.I understand. I see zero incentive in bonds as holdings right now. VOO and SCHD have 30% downside potential though so they are not relevant to the bond conversation. 
		
		
		08-02-2021, 09:50 AM 
		
	 
		Oh; I guess I think of them as pretty safe in the long run.  Looking at the S&P 500, 2018 and 2015 were minor blips; 2008 was pretty bad though (-38.49%).  I'm curious how some of these "retiree-safe" bond funds did in 2008.
	 (08-02-2021, 09:50 AM)ken-do-nim Wrote: Oh; I guess I think of them as pretty safe in the long run. Looking at the S&P 500, 2018 and 2015 were minor blips; 2008 was pretty bad though (-38.49%). I'm curious how some of these "retiree-safe" bond funds did in 2008.It's all good until it happens the year you are retiring. Know anyone that had their 2008-2010 retirement cancelled by the market? I do and I felt really bad for them. How about 2000-2010? 10 years of no port growth is not a blip to me. You ever dump a stock that didn't go up for 90 days? If so, a decade may not be a blip to you either. I would not be retiring next year had I not gotten lucky and missed over half the pain of the GFC. I have a lot of respect for steep corrections due to high valuation. Real Estate that time and not stocks. We never know what the next trigger is. I believe the next one will be related to printing money so that probably isn't it. That's just how it works. By the way TLT was up 20% the month the 2008 GFC crash happened. So up 58% over SPY. TLT is a good proxy for a safe retiree bond fund. I have no interest now, but TLT has been around forever and a good comparison when you are playing with charts. 
		
		
		08-02-2021, 05:59 PM 
		
	 (08-02-2021, 07:45 AM)fenders53 Wrote:(08-02-2021, 06:02 AM)NilesMike Wrote: Bonds, as part of my TYD/UPRO strategy, has worked out very well. I am actually ALWAYS holding some TYD. When the market is risk on 50% of that portfolio is in TYD, when market is no-go, 100% is in TYD. I think I've linked this before (strat @ Drftr TYD?UPRO.) https://martinschwoerer.medium.com/etf-i...d6d51a3e32 It's a simple hedged strategy that blows away the market and has way less drawdowns. Haven't found much that beats this. 
		
		
		08-02-2021, 06:02 PM 
		
	 (08-02-2021, 05:59 PM)NilesMike Wrote:Yes I have checked out the strat. I have no interest in holding TYD by itself. Down 15% last 12 months is not what I am looking for when I think buy a bond. As part of a strat that flips positions, I get it.(08-02-2021, 07:45 AM)fenders53 Wrote:(08-02-2021, 06:02 AM)NilesMike Wrote: Bonds, as part of my TYD/UPRO strategy, has worked out very well. 
		
		
		08-02-2021, 06:28 PM 
		
	 (08-02-2021, 06:02 PM)fenders53 Wrote:(08-02-2021, 05:59 PM)NilesMike Wrote:Yes I have checked out the strat. I have no interest in holding TYD by itself. Down 15% last 12 months is not what I am looking for when I think buy a bond. As part of a strat that flips positions, I get it.(08-02-2021, 07:45 AM)fenders53 Wrote:(08-02-2021, 06:02 AM)NilesMike Wrote: Bonds, as part of my TYD/UPRO strategy, has worked out very well. I'm assuming you didn't like the strat enough to use it? 
		
		
		08-02-2021, 06:34 PM 
		
	 
		Nothing wrong with the strat.  I do intend to use it.  I remain distracted with the put selling game.  I've had a really good 2021 while remaining conservative.  JUL was mediocre though.
	 | 
| 
					« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
				 | 
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

 
 

 

