Posts: 270
Threads: 50
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
6
So any initial reactions to the Fed's decision to ever-so-slightly begin to taper its asset-buying (from $85 billion per month to $75 billion per month)? They also indicated much more affirmatively that interest rates are very likely going to stay really low for a fair while longer.
I'd think that together, these would be very bullish signals for the market. But except for yesterday's moderate pop, the reaction seems to be ho-hum.
Posts: 583
Threads: 62
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
16
The market is already toppy according to historical standards. Is it reasonable to expect some dramatic acceleration in corporate earnings in 2014. I think not, and absent strong earnings, what will be the driver, other than continued kool aid from the Fed.
Alex
Posts: 433
Threads: 37
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
10
There are undervalued stocks there. For dividend growth investors it is not a stock market, it is a market of stocks.
There are almost always good buys out there.
Posts: 583
Threads: 62
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
16
What is your short list of 'under valued' stocks? I fail to see any. Most all conservative DG types of stocks are sporting p/e's of 18-20 or higher and anything with a lower p/e, for the most part, is discounted for good reasons.
Alex
Posts: 1,172
Threads: 101
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
36
Man, this is a large and overheated topic.
Overall, I think it's a good thing and I think the Fed is going about it in a calculated, logical manner. I think the greatest danger the economy faced was radical changes in any monetary policy.
I was tempted to add a lot more but, after reviewing my position which covered points going back over 100 years, I think I'll stop here and see what, if anything, others add.
As for the undervalued stocks, I think Helmerich & Payne (HP) is at the bottom range of fairly valued if not a little undervalued right now. Just added some to my portfolio this past week. The last dividend boost added to my opinion.