Posts: 433
Threads: 37
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
10
Thanks Eric,
I hold TXN (cost basis $113.48). I am unable to buy AVGO at its current valuation, but there are others out there. Like ATO, SNA and PB that I do not currently own and are are undervalued; and LMT and EOG that i do own and are likely undervalued.
All have Very Safe dividend safety ratings and Fast or Very Fast Dividend Growth as rated also by Simply Safe Dividends.
Point is, I would have choices.
Posts: 6,404
Threads: 47
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation:
63
CSCO has been right on the edge for so long. Reliable business but just can't separate themselves from the competition. In some ways like INTC. I understand why someone might hold them for the yield but there would be scores of better choices when chips dip.
Posts: 433
Threads: 37
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
10
I do not think a 2,5% yield is much of a reason to hold CSCO, unless they start really upping their dividend increases.
2.5% yield with less than a 5% dividend increase is just not very attractive to me.
Posts: 433
Threads: 37
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
10
TXN has about 2.35% yield and just announced a 13% dividend increase this past September.
How is that for tech.
Posts: 1,530
Threads: 172
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
24
Yeah, hard to get too excited about CSCO right now. Yield and payout ratio are ok / meh, while p/e, div growth, earning growth, etc are pretty uninspiring. I'm hanging on the few shares I bought in 2013 for about $22 each, but can't imagine adding soon.
Posts: 433
Threads: 37
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
10
AVGO's current yield at the close on Friday was 2.6%, but that is still higher.