Posts: 433
	Threads: 37
	Joined: Dec 2013
	
Reputation: 
10
	 
 
	
	
		Thanks Eric,
I hold TXN (cost basis $113.48).  I am unable to buy AVGO at its current valuation, but there are others out there.  Like ATO, SNA and PB that I do not currently own and are are undervalued; and LMT and EOG that i do own and are likely undervalued.
All have Very Safe dividend safety ratings and Fast or Very Fast Dividend Growth as rated also by Simply Safe Dividends.
Point is, I would have choices.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 6,404
	Threads: 47
	Joined: Aug 2018
	
Reputation: 
63
	 
 
	
	
		CSCO has been right on the edge for so long.  Reliable business but just can't separate themselves from the competition.  In some ways like INTC.  I understand why someone might hold them for the yield but there would be scores of better choices when chips dip.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 433
	Threads: 37
	Joined: Dec 2013
	
Reputation: 
10
	 
 
	
	
		I do not think a 2,5% yield is much of a reason to hold CSCO, unless they start really upping their dividend increases.
2.5% yield with less than a 5% dividend increase is just not very attractive to me.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 433
	Threads: 37
	Joined: Dec 2013
	
Reputation: 
10
	 
 
	
	
		TXN has about  2.35% yield and just announced a 13% dividend increase this past September.
How is that for tech.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,558
	Threads: 176
	Joined: Mar 2013
	
Reputation: 
25
	 
 
	
	
		Yeah, hard to get too excited about CSCO right now. Yield and payout ratio are ok / meh, while p/e, div growth, earning growth, etc are pretty uninspiring. I'm hanging on the few shares I bought in 2013 for about $22 each, but can't imagine adding soon.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 433
	Threads: 37
	Joined: Dec 2013
	
Reputation: 
10
	 
 
	
	
		AVGO's current yield at the close on Friday was 2.6%,  but that is still higher.