Altman Z-score - Printable Version +- Dividend Growth Forum (http://DividendGrowthForum.com) +-- Forum: Dividend Growth Investing (http://DividendGrowthForum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +--- Forum: Resources for Dividend Growth Investors (http://DividendGrowthForum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=36) +--- Thread: Altman Z-score (/showthread.php?tid=1272) |
Altman Z-score - Roadmap2Retire - 07-26-2015 In my continued education of investing methods and metrics, I came across Altman Z-score and looked really interesting. Seems like a great way to quickly judge the overall financial condition of a company. Out of curiosity, do other DGIs pay attention to this score? The Altman Z-score RE: Altman Z-score - navyasw02 - 07-26-2015 Interesting, but I found an article from April saying MAT was a good investment based on its Altman Z-score and that was evidence enough for me to stop looking at this seriously. RE: Altman Z-score - rapidacid - 07-26-2015 Yes, Altman Z-Score has a 5% weighting in my scoring criteria RE: Altman Z-score - Caversham - 07-26-2015 I'm familiar with the ratio, and use it primarily to filter out companies when performing a screen. It looks like rapidacid utilizes this metric similarly. I've found the metric less useful when seriously analyzing a company. If I've gotten to the "serious analysis" stage, then I will already have a firm conviction that the company is very unlikely to declare bankruptcy. (07-26-2015, 10:30 AM)navyasw02 Wrote: Interesting, but I found an article from April saying MAT was a good investment based on its Altman Z-score and that was evidence enough for me to stop looking at this seriously. Isn't this is like saying: "Enron falsified financial statements, so I no longer look at financial statements when analyzing a companies." RE: Altman Z-score - navyasw02 - 07-26-2015 (07-26-2015, 03:08 PM)Caversham Wrote: I'm familiar with the ratio, and use it primarily to filter out companies when performing a screen. It looks like rapidacid utilizes this metric similarly. Not really. One is the illegal fraudulent reporting of source data which drives bad analysis, and the other is misuse of an analytical tool on good data. |