Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DRIP vs NOn-DRIP and Tax implications
#8
(11-09-2015, 08:44 AM)rapidacid Wrote: For the United States:

Quote:Taxation
Another misconception about DRIPs is that they are not subject to tax because the investor is not receiving a cash dividend per se. In fact, while DRIPs are beneficial for their cost-effective approach to investing, they are still subject to tax. Because there was an actual cash dividend, although reinvested, it is considered to be income and thus taxable. And, as with any stock, capital gains from shares held in a DRIP are not calculated and taxed until the stock is finally sold, usually several years down the road. (For more, check out Capital Gains Tax 101.)

Read more: The Perks Of Dividend Reinvestment Plans http://www.investopedia.com/articles/02/...z3r0AQurAl
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/02/011602.asp

rapidacid, thanks for the info. I guess it makes sense to DRIP if I am not needing the income for at least 15-20 years, this way, I can also extend/postpone paying taxes every year, and only pay taxes at the time of the stock being sold during retirement years (which actually might put me in a lower tax rate)?

Am I correct with this understanding? Thanks.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: DRIP vs NOn-DRIP and Tax implications - by stewardinlife - 11-09-2015, 12:02 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)